Skip to content
Solved
SearchBrowse
Sign in

Contents

Legislation
Value Added Tax Act 1994

Crossheading Default surcharges and other penalties and criminal offences

  • Section 59 The default surcharge.
  • Section 59A Default surcharge: payments on account.
  • Section 59B Relationship between sections 59 and 59A.
  • Section 60 VAT evasion: conduct involving dishonesty.
  • Section 61 VAT evasion: liability of directors etc.
  • Section 62 Incorrect certificates as to zero-rating etc.
  • Section 63 Penalty for misdeclaration or neglect resulting in VAT loss for one accounting period equalling or exceeding certain amounts.
  • Section 64 Repeated misdeclarations.
  • Section 65 Inaccuracies in section 55A statements
  • Section 66 Failure to submit section 55A statement
  • Section 67 Failure to notify and unauthorised issue of invoices.
  • Section 67A Breach of controlled goods agreement
  • Section 68 Breaches of walking possession agreements.
  • Section 69 Breaches of regulatory provisions.
  • Section 69A Breach of record-keeping requirements etc. in relation to transactions in gold.
  • Section 69B Breach of record-keeping requirements imposed by directions
  • Section 69C Transactions connected with VAT fraud
  • Section 69D Penalties under section 69C: officers' liability
  • Section 69E Publication of details of persons liable to penalties under section 69C
  • Section 70 Mitigation of penalties under sections 60, 63, 64 , 67, 69A and 69C.
  • Section 71 Construction of sections 60 to 70.
  • Section 72 Offences.
  1. Default surcharges and other penalties and criminal offences
  2. Breach of record-keeping requirements etc. in relation to transactions in gold.

Section 69A | Breach of record-keeping requirements etc. in relation to transactions in gold. F1

From legislation.gov.uk

(1)This section applies where a person fails to comply with a requirement of regulations under section 13(5)(a) or (b) of the Finance Act 1999 (gold: duties to keep records or provide information).Where this section applies, the provisions of section 69 do not apply.F1

(2)A person who fails to comply with any such requirement is liable to a penalty not exceeding 17.5% of the value of the transactions to which the failure relates.F1

(3)For the purposes of assessing the amount of any such penalty, the value of the transactions to which the failure relates shall be determined by the Commissioners to the best of their judgement and notified by them to the person liable.F1

(4)No assessment of a penalty under this section shall be made more than 2 years after evidence of facts sufficient in the opinion of the Commissioners to justify the making of the assessment comes to their knowledge.F1

(5)The reference in subsection (4) above to facts sufficient to justify the making of the assessment is to facts sufficient—F1

(a)to indicate that there had been a failure to comply with any such requirement as is referred to in subsection (1) above, andF1

(b)to determine the value of the transactions to which the failure relates.F1

(6)A failure by any person to comply with any such requirement as is mentioned in subsection (1) above shall not give rise to a liability to a penalty under this section if the person concerned satisfies the Commissioners or, on appeal, a tribunal, that there is a reasonable excuse for the failure.F1

(7)Where by reason of conduct falling within subsection (1) above a person—F1

(a)is assessed to a penalty under section 60 or a penalty for a deliberate inaccuracy under Schedule 24 to the Finance Act 2007, orF1F2

(b)is convicted of an offence (whether under this Act or otherwise),F1

that conduct shall not also give rise to a penalty under this section.

Notes

  1. F1

    S. 69A inserted (28.7.2000) by 2000 c. 17, s. 137(2)

  2. F2

    Words in s. 69A(7)(a) inserted (1.4.2009) by The Finance Act 2008, Schedule 40 (Appointed Day, Transitional Provisions and Consequential Amendments) Order 2009 (S.I. 2009/571), art. 1(1), Sch. 1 para. 15

PreviousNext
PrivacyTerms