Skip to content
Solved
SearchBrowse
Sign in

Contents

Official guidance
Employment Related Securities Manual

ERSM20000 · Employment-related securities and options

  • ERSM20010 · Overview
  • ERSM20030 · Employers' costs
  • ERSM20110 · What are securities?
  • ERSM20130 · Insurance contracts
  • ERSM20150 · Warrants
  • ERSM20170 · Units in a collective investment scheme
  • ERSM20180 · Options and futures: futures
  • ERSM20190 · Contracts for differences
  • ERSM20192 · What are securities: Long Term Incentive Plan (LTIP)
  • ERSM20194 · What are securities: RSUs and dividend equivalents: examples
  • ERSM20196 · What are securities: phantom share plans
  • ERSM20200 · What are not securities?
  • ERSM20210 · ‘by reason of employment’
  • ERSM20215 · ‘by reason of employment’ - The deeming provision - HMRC v Vermilion Holdings Ltd
  • ERSM20220 · 'by reason of employment' - exception for family or personal relationships
  • ERSM20230 · Definition of ‘employment-related’
  • ERSM20250 · Associated person and 'the box'
  • ERSM20260 · Exclusions from charge
  • ERSM20270 · Exclusions: deaths
  • ERSM20280 · Exclusions: 7 year rule
  • ERSM20300 · Exclusions: residence (up to 5 April 2015)
  • ERSM20350 · Exclusions: disability
  • ERSM20370 · Exclusions: public offers
  • ERSM20390 · Negative amounts treated as nil
  • ERSM20400 · Meaning of ‘market value’
  • ERSM20420 · Definition of ‘acquisition’ of securities or option
  • ERSM20440 · Replacement and exchanges of securities and securities options
  • ERSM20450 · Rights issues
  • ERSM20500 · Money’s worth charge
  • ERSM20510 · Weight v Salmon (19TC174)
  • ERSM20520 · Ede v Wilson (26TC381)
  • ERSM20540 · When shares are acquired for money’s worth charge
  1. Employment-related securities and options: contents
  2. Employment-related securities and options: Ede v Wilson (26TC381)

ERSM20520 | Employment-related securities and options: Ede v Wilson (26TC381)

From HM Revenue & Customs · Employment Related Securities Manual

A similar point arose in Ede v Wilson (26TC381). In that case, a group of employees were allotted shares on the condition that, as long as they continued to work for the company, they could not sell them without the permission of the company’s directors. The Court held that the shares were still emoluments, or earnings, even though there was a restriction on sale. The restriction was simply a factor to be taken into account in determining the value of the earnings.

PreviousNext
PrivacyTerms