Skip to content
Solved
SearchBrowse
Sign in

Contents

Official guidance
Employment Status Manual

ESM7000 · Case Law

  • ESM7006 · List of Abbreviations
  • ESM7007 · Introduction - General
  • ESM7008 · Introduction - Preliminary Matters
  • ESM7009 · Introduction - Use of Case Law in Employment Status Work
  • ESM7010 · Brief History
  • ESM7020 · Davies v Braithwaite
  • ESM7025 · Morren v Swinton and Pendlebury Borough Council
  • ESM7030 · Ready Mixed Concrete (South East) Ltd v Minister of Pensions and National Insurance
  • ESM7040 · Market Investigations Ltd v Minister of Social Security
  • ESM7055 · Fall v Hitchen
  • ESM7060 · Airfix Footwear Ltd v Cope
  • ESM7070 · Massey v Crown Life Insurance Company
  • ESM7080 · Edwards v Clinch
  • ESM7090 · Narich Pty. Limited v The Commissioner of Pay-roll Tax
  • ESM7100 · O'Kelly and Others v Trusthouse Forte plc
  • ESM7110 · Nethermere (St Neots) Ltd v Gardiner and Taverna
  • ESM7120 · Sidey v Phillips
  • ESM7130 · Walls v Sinnett
  • ESM7140 · Lee Ting Sang v Chung Chi-Keung
  • ESM7150 · Andrews v King
  • ESM7160 · Hall v Lorimer
  • ESM7165 · Lane v The Shire Roofing Company (Oxford) Ltd
  • ESM7170 · Barnett v Brabyn
  • ESM7180 · Secretary of State for Employment v McMeechan
  • ESM7190 · Clark v Oxfordshire Health Authority
  • ESM7200 · Carmichael & Another v National Power plc
  • ESM7210 · Express and Echo Publications Ltd v Tanton
  • ESM7220 · (1) MacFarlane & (2) Skivington v Glasgow City Council
  • ESM7230 · St John’s College School, Cambridge v Secretary of State for Social Security
  • ESM7240 · Montgomery v Johnson Underwood Ltd
  • ESM7250 · Todd & Others v Adams & Another
  • ESM7260 · Synaptek Ltd v Young
  • ESM7270 · Usetech Ltd v Young
  • ESM7280 · Future Online Ltd v Foulds
  • ESM7290 · Dragonfly Consultancy Ltd v HMRC Commissioners
  • ESM7300 · HMRC Commissioners v Larkstar Data Ltd
  • ESM7310 · Autoclenz Ltd and Belcher & Ors
  • ESM7315 · The Commissioners For HMRC and Talentcore Limited (t/a) Team Spirits
  • ESM7320 · Christa Ackroyd Media Limited v Revenue & Customs
  • ESM7325 · Northern Lights Solutions Ltd v Revenue & Customs
  • ESM7330 · Kickabout Productions Limited v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs
  • ESM7335 · The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs v Atholl House Productions Ltd
  • ESM7340 · Red, White and Green Limited V Revenue and Customs
  • ESM7005 · Table of Cases (in alphabetical order)
  1. Case Law: contents
  2. Case Law: Introduction - Use of Case Law in Employment Status Work

ESM7009 | Case Law: Introduction - Use of Case Law in Employment Status Work

From HM Revenue & Customs · Employment Status Manual

Case law assists us in interpreting the facts and coming to a conclusion as to the nature of a particular contract. Over the years the courts have laid down a number of tests, conditions or indicia which should be considered as a whole in determining employment status. However, there is neither a single test nor a magic formula for determining the nature of a contract.

It is the principle established by a court in a particular case that is important as it may set a binding precedent. Even then the courts may restrict or widen the application of a principle established in an earlier case.

One thing the courts have consistently stressed is that every case must be decided on its own particular facts. (see Walls v Sinnett 60TC150 at ESM7130and Barnett v Brabyn at ESM7170). The courts have a habit of distinguishing one case from another on the facts.

If the facts are on all fours with a decided case, then that may be a good indicator of how the courts will decide but there is no certainty there. It is recommended that you should

  • ascertain the facts

  • interpret the facts using the principles established in reported cases

  • then form an opinion on the worker’s employment status.

PreviousNext
PrivacyTerms