Skip to content
Solved
SearchBrowse
Sign in

Contents

Official guidance
Oil Taxation Manual

OT18500 · PRT compliance

  • OT18510 · Risk factors and distinctive features of the tax
  • OT18520 · Changes in approach to the management of risk
  • OT18530 · LB operating model - the role of the CRM in PRT
  • OT18540 · Tax compliance risk management process guidance
  • OT18550 · The new approach to governance and delivery
  • OT18560 · The relationship with low risk customers
  • OT18570 · Responding to specific returns, claims and notification from a low risk customer
  • OT18580 · Joint Venture Claims - Confidentiality
  • OT18590 · Clear errors
  • OT18600 · Risk assessment - evaluating potential sources of risk against all available information
  • OT18610 · Risk assessment - the process
  • OT18620 · Risk assessment - mandatory work, projects and campaigns
  • OT18630 · Risk assessment - regime integrity work
  • OT18640 · Risk assessment - the risk review process
  • OT18650 · Risk assessment - first claims and continuing audits
  • OT18660 · Risk working - PRT / accounts reconciliations
  • OT18670 · Risk working - time limits and expenditure claims
  1. PRT compliance: contents
  2. PRT Compliance: Joint Venture Claims - Confidentiality

OT18580 | PRT Compliance: Joint Venture Claims - Confidentiality

From HM Revenue & Customs · Oil Taxation Manual

The risk status will determine how claims are treated (see OT18570). Other participators will benefit from the good systems and controls that back up the Low Risk status of the Responsible Person. But a field’s Schedule 5 claims may be subject to more enquiries if the status of the Responsible Person is not Low Risk.

There may be a worry concerning confidentiality in relation to the risk status of the Responsible Person. In reality their risk position is unlikely to be so obvious:

  • We will not necessarily raise enquiries on an entity which is not Low Risk

  • Enquiries may result from mandatory work, projects or risk campaigns

  • Reviews of accounting systems may be necessary either as risk assessment or as a preliminary to agreeing low risk status.

We would expect the Responsible Person to give some indication to co-participators as to the level of enquiries that may be expected, for whatever reason, e.g. if systems and controls are still evolving. However a Responsible Person may see this as an issue and HMRC will need to discuss with them how to manage the situation.

PreviousNext
PrivacyTerms