Skip to content
Solved
SearchBrowse
Sign in

Contents

Official guidance
Oil Taxation Manual

OT18500 · PRT compliance

  • OT18510 · Risk factors and distinctive features of the tax
  • OT18520 · Changes in approach to the management of risk
  • OT18530 · LB operating model - the role of the CRM in PRT
  • OT18540 · Tax compliance risk management process guidance
  • OT18550 · The new approach to governance and delivery
  • OT18560 · The relationship with low risk customers
  • OT18570 · Responding to specific returns, claims and notification from a low risk customer
  • OT18580 · Joint Venture Claims - Confidentiality
  • OT18590 · Clear errors
  • OT18600 · Risk assessment - evaluating potential sources of risk against all available information
  • OT18610 · Risk assessment - the process
  • OT18620 · Risk assessment - mandatory work, projects and campaigns
  • OT18630 · Risk assessment - regime integrity work
  • OT18640 · Risk assessment - the risk review process
  • OT18650 · Risk assessment - first claims and continuing audits
  • OT18660 · Risk working - PRT / accounts reconciliations
  • OT18670 · Risk working - time limits and expenditure claims
  1. PRT compliance: contents
  2. PRT compliance: risk assessment - first claims and continuing audits

OT18650 | PRT compliance: risk assessment - first claims and continuing audits

From HM Revenue & Customs · Oil Taxation Manual

Because returns and claims are not independently audited and are usually compiled close to the 6 month or year end an understanding of the accounting system that underpins those returns and claims is part of the risk assessment process.

In the past a First Claims Audit has been a major systems review which took place when a company became an operator for the first time. We will continue to want to understand the company’s systems and obtain assurance that they are adequate for the Responsible Person to meet their requirements in full. We will expect to engage soon after a company has become an operator. We also expect to be informed when there is a change of system or major upgrade. The objective should be to have an ongoing understanding of the systems and the controls in place.

The depth of any audit will depend on the circumstances but should be proportionate to the need for assurance. CCMs and tax specialists will be aware of the resource requirements on both companies and LB.

Operator systems are usually subject to joint venture audits. If companies agree these should be obtained to see if they can contribute to the assurance assessment. Joint venture audits may have a focus which does not reflect LB Oil & Gas’s concerns. Nevertheless we should aim to rely as far as possible on the work a company does to ensure that its systems are accurate and joint venture audits should be seen as part of the system of controls.

PreviousNext
PrivacyTerms