Skip to content
Solved
SearchBrowse
Sign in

Contents

Official guidance
VAT Supply and Consideration

VATSC11130 · Supply: Single and multiple supplies: Precedent cases

  • VATSC11131 · Mander Laundries Limited (BIRM/73/31)
  • VATSC11132 · British Airways (Court of Appeal 1990 STC 643)
  • VATSC11133 · Faaborg-Gelting Linien A/S (C-231/94)
  • VATSC11134 · Madgett and Baldwin (C-308/96 & C-94/97)
  • VATSC11135 · Card Protection Plan (C-349/96)
  • VATSC11136 · British Telecommunications plc (House of Lords 1999 STC 758)
  • VATSC11137 · British Sky Broadcasting Group plc (LON/98/889)
  • VATSC11138 · MD Foods plc (LON/00/899) & United Biscuits (UK) Ltd (Court of Session [1992] STC325)
  • VATSC11139 · Sea Containers Services Ltd (High Court 2000 STC 82) & Durham River Trips Limited (MAN/99/876)
  • VATSC11140 · FDR Limited (Court of Appeal 2000 STC 672)
  • VATSC11141 · Dr Beynon (2004 UKHL 53)
  • VATSC11142 · Levob Verzekeringen BV (C-41/04)
  • VATSC11143 · Telewest (Court of Appeal [2005] STC 481)
  • VATSC11144 · College of Estate Management (2005 UKHL 62)
  • VATSC11145 · Aktiebolaget NN (C-111/05)
  • VATSC11146 · Weight Watchers (UK) Ltd (Court of Appeal [2008] STC 2313) & David Baxendale (Court of Appeal [2009] STC 2578)
  • VATSC11147 · Part Service Srl (C-425/06)
  • VATSC11148 · Everything Everywhere (C-276/09)
  • VATSC11149 · RLRE Tellmer Property sro (C-572/07)
  • VATSC11150 · The Lower Mill Estate Limited (Upper Tier Tribunal FTC 10/2009)
  • VATSC11151 · Purple Parking (C-117/11)
  • VATSC11152 · Deutsche Bank (C-44/11)
  • VATSC11153 · Goals Soccer Centres ( [2012] UKFTT 576)
  • VATSC11154 · The Honourable Society of Middle Temple (UKUT 0250)
  • VATSC11155 · BGZ Leasing sp z.o.o (C-224/11)
  1. Supply: Single and multiple supplies: Precedent cases: Contents
  2. Supply: Single and multiple supplies: Precedent cases: Part Service Srl (C-425/06)

VATSC11147 | Supply: Single and multiple supplies: Precedent cases: Part Service Srl (C-425/06)

From HM Revenue & Customs · VAT Supply and Consideration

This referral from Italy concerned the leasing of motor vehicles where the taxable supply of leasing was split with the finance element being characterised as an exempt supply by a separate entity. The Italian tax authorities contended that the abuse principle applied as the supply of leasing had been artificially divided to gain a tax advantage rather than for valid economic reasons. The case was referred to the ECJ for guidance as to whether abuse applied on the facts of the case and whether the second limb (‘essential aim’) of the two-part test for abuse (identified by the ECJ in the Halifax case C-255/02) was a sole purpose test.

The ECJ ruled it was for the national court to decide whether the arrangement was abusive, but it gave guidance on relevant factors concerning single/multiple supplies and it identified significant characteristics of the arrangements which should be taken into account (at para 57) including the price paid by the customer and that the leasing service by itself was economically unprofitable so the viability of the business was compromised. The Italian supreme court subsequently ruled that the arrangements were abusive.

This case is therefore important when considering situations where it appears that a single supply has been split between two entities. You should consult TAPE colleagues at an early stage if you think that the abuse principle might apply in such circumstances.

PreviousNext
PrivacyTerms