Skip to content
Solved
SearchBrowse
Sign in

Contents

Official guidance
VAT Supply and Consideration

VATSC11130 · Supply: Single and multiple supplies: Precedent cases

  • VATSC11131 · Mander Laundries Limited (BIRM/73/31)
  • VATSC11132 · British Airways (Court of Appeal 1990 STC 643)
  • VATSC11133 · Faaborg-Gelting Linien A/S (C-231/94)
  • VATSC11134 · Madgett and Baldwin (C-308/96 & C-94/97)
  • VATSC11135 · Card Protection Plan (C-349/96)
  • VATSC11136 · British Telecommunications plc (House of Lords 1999 STC 758)
  • VATSC11137 · British Sky Broadcasting Group plc (LON/98/889)
  • VATSC11138 · MD Foods plc (LON/00/899) & United Biscuits (UK) Ltd (Court of Session [1992] STC325)
  • VATSC11139 · Sea Containers Services Ltd (High Court 2000 STC 82) & Durham River Trips Limited (MAN/99/876)
  • VATSC11140 · FDR Limited (Court of Appeal 2000 STC 672)
  • VATSC11141 · Dr Beynon (2004 UKHL 53)
  • VATSC11142 · Levob Verzekeringen BV (C-41/04)
  • VATSC11143 · Telewest (Court of Appeal [2005] STC 481)
  • VATSC11144 · College of Estate Management (2005 UKHL 62)
  • VATSC11145 · Aktiebolaget NN (C-111/05)
  • VATSC11146 · Weight Watchers (UK) Ltd (Court of Appeal [2008] STC 2313) & David Baxendale (Court of Appeal [2009] STC 2578)
  • VATSC11147 · Part Service Srl (C-425/06)
  • VATSC11148 · Everything Everywhere (C-276/09)
  • VATSC11149 · RLRE Tellmer Property sro (C-572/07)
  • VATSC11150 · The Lower Mill Estate Limited (Upper Tier Tribunal FTC 10/2009)
  • VATSC11151 · Purple Parking (C-117/11)
  • VATSC11152 · Deutsche Bank (C-44/11)
  • VATSC11153 · Goals Soccer Centres ( [2012] UKFTT 576)
  • VATSC11154 · The Honourable Society of Middle Temple (UKUT 0250)
  • VATSC11155 · BGZ Leasing sp z.o.o (C-224/11)
  1. Supply: Single and multiple supplies: Precedent cases: Contents
  2. Supply: Single and multiple supplies: Precedent cases: Purple Parking (C-117/11)

VATSC11151 | Supply: Single and multiple supplies: Precedent cases: Purple Parking (C-117/11)

From HM Revenue & Customs · VAT Supply and Consideration

The ECJ was asked to rule on whether the bus transport provided as part of an airport parking service was a separate supply to that of parking. The ECJ held that there was a “single complex supply of services in which the parking element is predominant”.

The ECJ made a significant point at para 31 of the judgment where the court states: “the fact that, in other circumstances, the elements in issue can be or are supplied separately is of no importance, given that possibility is inherent in the concept of a single composite transaction”. This reinforces the principle of looking at the economic reality of the situation rather than artificially separating out elements of a single supply.

The ECJ also considered the application of the principle of fiscal neutrality is not a primary issue when considering the supply position because ‘a complex supply of services consisting of separate elements is not automatically similar to the supply of those elements separately’ leading to a ‘necessarily’ different tax treatment (paras 38 and 39 refer). Fiscal neutrality is only a relevant consideration when two supplies are in competition with each other.

PreviousNext
PrivacyTerms