Skip to content
Solved
SearchBrowse
Sign in

Contents

Official guidance
Employment Income Manual

EIM03600 · Employment income: restrictive covenants

  • EIM03601 · Restrictive undertakings: statutory conditions
  • EIM03602 · Restrictive covenants: consideration taxable as general earnings
  • EIM03603 · Restrictive undertakings: operation of PAYE on consideration
  • EIM03604 · Restrictive undertakings: non-cash consideration
  • EIM03605 · Restrictive undertakings: termination agreements
  • EIM03606 · Restrictive covenants: compromise agreements
  • EIM03610 · Text of Statement of Practice 3/1996
  • EIM03620 · Restrictive covenants: example 1: restrictions in the contract of employment
  • EIM03621 · Restrictive covenants: example 2: total or partial fulfilment of restrictive undertakings
  • EIM03623 · Restrictive covenants: example 3: deductions
  • EIM03624 · Restrictive covenants: example 4: covenants given by directors in company take-over
  • EIM03625 · Restrictive covenants: example 5: non-cash consideration: transfer of asset
  • EIM03626 · Restrictive covenants: example 6: compromise agreements
  1. Employment income: contents
  2. Employment income: restrictive covenants: contents

EIM03600 | Employment income: restrictive covenants: contents

From HM Revenue & Customs · Employment Income Manual

Sections 225 to 226 ITEPA 2003

General

An employee may receive a payment in connection with his or her employment for agreeing to restrict their future conduct or activities. Such an agreement is known as a restrictive covenant or undertaking. It is usually (though not invariably) made between employee and employer in order to restrict the employee’s activities if the employment is terminated.

The Inland Revenue took the view that such payments were taxable as earnings and chargeable under the equivalent of Section 62 ITEPA 2003 (see EIM00511). The courts took a different view in the case of Beak v Robson (25TC33). Mr Robson had been a company director for many years. In 1937 he entered into an agreement that included a clause that prevented him from competing with the company within a fifty mile radius of Newcastle-upon-Tyne if he left the company within five years. The Courts decided that the payment was not a profit from his office, as it was in respect of a covenant operative only after that office had ceased. It was not chargeable.

Under ITEPA 2003 receipts for restrictive covenants are treated as earnings from the employment (see EIM00513).

Contents13 entries

  1. EIM03601Restrictive undertakings: statutory conditions
  2. EIM03602Restrictive covenants: consideration taxable as general earnings
  3. EIM03603Restrictive undertakings: operation of PAYE on consideration
  4. EIM03604Restrictive undertakings: non-cash consideration
  5. EIM03605Restrictive undertakings: termination agreements
  6. EIM03606Restrictive covenants: compromise agreements
  7. EIM03610Text of Statement of Practice 3/1996
  8. EIM03620Restrictive covenants: example 1: restrictions in the contract of employment
  9. EIM03621Restrictive covenants: example 2: total or partial fulfilment of restrictive undertakings
  10. EIM03623Restrictive covenants: example 3: deductions
  11. EIM03624Restrictive covenants: example 4: covenants given by directors in company take-over
  12. EIM03625Restrictive covenants: example 5: non-cash consideration: transfer of asset
  13. EIM03626Restrictive covenants: example 6: compromise agreements
PreviousNext
PrivacyTerms