Skip to content
Solved
SearchBrowse
Sign in

Contents

Official guidance
Business Income Manual

BIM20200 · Meaning of trade: badges of trade

  • BIM20201 · The origin of the concept
  • BIM20205 · Summary
  • BIM20210 · Profit-seeking motive
  • BIM20215 · Profit-seeking motive - not main purpose
  • BIM20220 · Profit-seeking motive - fiscal purpose
  • BIM20230 · Isolated transactions
  • BIM20235 · Repeated operations
  • BIM20240 · Repeated transactions - later transactions reflecting on first
  • BIM20245 · Nature of the asset
  • BIM20250 · Income-producing assets
  • BIM20255 · Assets acquired for personal enjoyment
  • BIM20260 · Assets with no income yield or ‘pride of possession’
  • BIM20265 · Quantity purchased
  • BIM20270 · Connection with existing trade
  • BIM20275 · Modification of the asset
  • BIM20280 · Organisation of the activity
  • BIM20285 · Sales organisation
  • BIM20290 · Company formed for the purpose of the transaction
  • BIM20295 · Reasons for sale
  • BIM20300 · Method of finance
  • BIM20305 · Funding from an existing trade
  • BIM20310 · Interval of time between purchase and sale
  • BIM20315 · Supervening trade
  • BIM20401 · Intention - stated intention
  • BIM20405 · Intention - unequivocal and equivocal transactions
  • BIM20410 · Intention - dual motive transactions
  • BIM20415 · Intention - dual motive transactions - links to non-trading undertakings or charities
  • BIM20420 · Memorandum of association
  1. Meaning of trade: badges of trade: contents
  2. Meaning of trade: badges of trade: company formed for the purpose of the transaction

BIM20290 | Meaning of trade: badges of trade: company formed for the purpose of the transaction

From HM Revenue & Customs · Business Income Manual

The existence of a registered syndicate, or a company formed solely or mainly for the purpose of the particular transaction, is evidence in favour of trading.

For example, in Californian Copper Syndicate (Limited and Reduced) v Harris [1904] 5 TC 159 a company was formed, amongst other things, to acquire and resell mining property and did in fact buy, develop and sell such property at a profit. The purpose for which it was formed, in conjunction with its actions, was among the factors which led the court to find that the company had traded.

By way of contrast, in Tebrau (Johore) Rubber Syndicate Ltd v Farmer [1910] 5 TC 658 an opposite conclusion was reached. The court held that although a profit on disposal had been realised there was no evidence that the company had intended make profits from buying and selling, as distinct from developing and working, the plantations.

See also CIR v Toll Property Co Ltd (in liquidation) [1952] 34 TC 13.

PreviousNext
PrivacyTerms