Skip to content
Solved
SearchBrowse
Sign in

Contents

Official guidance
Employment Status Manual

ESM0500 · Guide to determining status - overview

  • ESM0501 · Guide to determining status: importance of fact finding
  • ESM0502 · Guide to determining status: fact finding techniques
  • ESM0503 · Guide to determining status: engager’s business
  • ESM0504 · Guide to employment status: nature of the job
  • ESM0505 · Guide to employment status: engagement of the worker
  • ESM0506 · Guide to employment status: contracts
  • ESM0507 · Guide to determining status: importance of a written contract
  • ESM0508 · Guide to determining status: oral contracts
  • ESM0509 · Guide to determining status: contracts - are the terms genuine?
  • ESM0510 · Guide to determining status: contracts - getting at the true terms
  • ESM0511 · Guide to determining status: Contracts - what are the differences?
  • ESM0512 · Guide to determining status: Contracts - establishing the reasons for differences
  • ESM0513 · Guide to determining status: how do you know if there is a contract of service?
  • ESM0514 · Guide to determining status: ’in business on own account test’
  • ESM0515 · Guide to determining status: relevant factors
  • ESM0516 · Guide to determining status: control - overview
  • ESM0517 · Guide to determining status: relative importance of control
  • ESM0518 · Guide to determining status: right of control
  • ESM0519 · Guide to determining status: control - what, where, when and how
  • ESM0520 · Guide to determining status: control over what the worker does
  • ESM0521 · Guide to determining status: control over what is done - examples
  • ESM0522 · Guide to determining status: control over where work is done
  • ESM0523 · Guide to determining status: control over where work is done - examples
  • ESM0524 · Guide to determining status: control over when the work is done
  • ESM0525 · Guide to determining status: control over when the work is done - examples
  • ESM0526 · Guide to determining status: control over how the work is done
  • ESM0527 · Guide to determining status: control over how work is done - examples
  • ESM0528 · Guide to determining status: control over experts
  • ESM0529 · Guide to determining status: control exercisable by various means
  • ESM0530 · Guide to determining status: Personal Service
  • ESM0531 · Guide to determining status: the requirement for personal service
  • ESM0532 · Guide to determining status: an obligation to provide a substitute
  • ESM0533 · Guide to determining status: right of substitution
  • ESM0534 · Guide to determining status: the obligation/right to send a substitute must be genuine
  • ESM0535 · Guide to determining status: is the right of substitution genuine
  • ESM0536 · Guide to determining status: the weight to be given to a genuine right of substitution
  • ESM0537 · Guide to determining status: disproving a right of substitution
  • ESM0538 · Guide to determining status: ignoring a claimed right to substitution
  • ESM0539 · Guide to determining status: engaging helpers
  • ESM0540 · Guide to determining status: provision of equipment
  • ESM0541 · Guide to determining status: financial risk
  • ESM0542 · Guide to determining status: basis of payment
  • ESM0543 · Guide to determining status: mutuality of obligation
  • ESM0544 · Guide to determining status: holiday pay, maternity pay, sick pay and pension rights
  • ESM0545 · Guide to determining status: part and parcel of the organisation
  • ESM0546 · Guide to determining status: right to terminate a contract
  • ESM0547 · Guide to determining status: opportunity to profit from sound management
  • ESM0548 · Guide to determining status: length of engagement
  • ESM0549 · Guide to determining status: personal factors (general)
  • ESM0550 · Guide to determining status: personal factors (Lorimer case)
  • ESM0551 · Guide to determining status: personal factors (effect of Lorimer on short term engagements)
  • ESM0552 · Guide to determining status: personal factors (effect of Lorimer on relatively long-term part-time engagements)
  • ESM0553 · Guide to determining status: regularly working for one engager
  • ESM0554 · Guide to determining status: intention of parties
  • ESM0555 · Guide to determining status: exclusive services
  • ESM0556 · Guide to determining status: picture painting
  • ESM0557 · Guide to determining status: what to do in disputed cases
  • ESM0558 · Guide to determining status: fact finding/evidence gathering
  • ESM0560 · Evaluative Exercise required at the third stage of Ready Mixed Concrete
  1. Guide to determining status - overview: contents
  2. Guide to determining status: the weight to be given to a genuine right of substitution

ESM0536 | Guide to determining status: the weight to be given to a genuine right of substitution

From HM Revenue & Customs · Employment Status Manual

A genuine right of substitution is a pointer to self-employment.

The weight to be given to such a provision will however depend on the particular facts of each case. For example, in the case of Mrs MacFarlane & Mrs Skivington v Glasgow City Council (EAT/1277/99) - see ESM7220, the Employment Tribunal found as fact that:

“If for any reason, one of the applicants was unable to take a class, she would contact a replacement from the register of coaches maintained by the respondents, and arrange for her class to be covered by a member on the register.”

The Employment Appeals Tribunal distinguished this case from the Tanton case (see ESM7210) for four cumulative reasons:

  • Mrs M and Mrs S could not choose not to attend or not to work in person

  • they could not provide anyone but only someone from the Council register

  • the Council sometimes organised the replacement

  • the Council did not pay Mrs M/Mrs S but instead paid the substitute direct.

They later added:

“We cannot regard a provision of the kind found by the Tribunal in our case to have such force that it had to be seen to overwhelm the factors pointing the other way; it was not such that had inescapably to lead to a conclusion that the Appellants were not employees.”

In effect the Employment Appeals Tribunal found that personal service was required and that although a genuine right of substitution existed that right did not clearly outweigh other factors pointing towards a contract of service.

In the case of Synaptek Ltd v Young [2003] EWHC 645 (Ch) - see ESM7260- which was concerned with the IR35 legislation, Mr Justice Hart said in considering whether the substitution clause in that case was a pointer to employment or self- employment:

“The Commissioners were entitled in my judgment to regard it as simply one fact among others and, in assessing the weight to be given to it, to take into account the extent to which the provision was utilised in practice.”

PreviousNext
PrivacyTerms