Skip to content
Solved
SearchBrowse
Sign in

Contents

Official guidance
VAT Assessments and Error Correction

VAEC1400 · Powers of assessment: Best judgement: Contents page

  • VAEC1410 · Powers of assessment: Best judgement: The law
  • VAEC1420 · Powers of assessment: Best judgement: Definition
  • VAEC1430 · Power of assessment: Best judgement: How it is determined by tribunal
  • VAEC1431 · Power of assessment: Best judgement: Convincing a tribunal
  • VAEC1440 · Power of assessment: Best judgement: Partial breach of requirements
  • VAEC1450 · Power of assessment: Best judgement: Lack of information
  • VAEC1460 · Power of assessment: Best judgement: General principles for calculating arrears
  • VAEC1470 · Power of assessment: Best judgement: Calculating arrears using observations
  • VAEC1480 · Power of assessment: Best judgement: Calculating arrears using invigilation
  • VAEC1490 · Power of assessment: Best judgement: Calculating arrears using mark-up
  • VAEC1500 · Power of assessment: Best judgement: Other methods used to calculate arrears
  • VAEC1510 · Power of assessment: Best judgement: Determine the overall credibility of your assessment
  • VAEC1520 · Power of assessment: Best judgement: Some remedies for invalid assessments
  • VAEC1530 · Power of assessment: Best judgement: Prime assessments
  • VAEC1540 · Power of assessment: Best judgement: Helpful pointers
  • VAEC1550 · Power of assessment: Best judgement: Consistency with direct taxes assessments
  1. Powers of assessment: Best judgement: Contents page
  2. Power of assessment: Best judgement: Convincing a tribunal

VAEC1431 | Power of assessment: Best judgement: Convincing a tribunal

From HM Revenue & Customs · VAT Assessments and Error Correction

The importance of being able to convince a tribunal that an assessment has been made to best judgement is paramount. On appeal, the onus is on the business to disprove the assessment

Sometimes, a tribunal may substitute its own judgement for an officer’s in respect of the amount of the assessment but this does not mean that the officer’s judgement was defective, nor that the assessment failed the best judgement test.

In the case of M & A Georgiou t/a Mario’s Chippery, Manchester tribunal and QB October 1995 [1995] STC 1101 the business contended that an assessment raised was not to best judgement.

The tribunal reviewed the evidence in detail and upheld the validity of the assessment but directed that the amount of the assessment should be reduced.

The business appealed to the High Court who upheld the tribunal decision, as it was not the function of the VAT tribunal to engage in a process that looks afresh at the totality of the evidential material before it.

On the evidence, the tribunal had been entitled to find that the assessment had been made to best judgement, even though the amount of the assessment had been reduced.

PreviousNext
PrivacyTerms