Skip to content
Solved
SearchBrowse
Sign in

Contents

Official guidance
VAT Assessments and Error Correction

VAEC1400 · Powers of assessment: Best judgement: Contents page

  • VAEC1410 · Powers of assessment: Best judgement: The law
  • VAEC1420 · Powers of assessment: Best judgement: Definition
  • VAEC1430 · Power of assessment: Best judgement: How it is determined by tribunal
  • VAEC1431 · Power of assessment: Best judgement: Convincing a tribunal
  • VAEC1440 · Power of assessment: Best judgement: Partial breach of requirements
  • VAEC1450 · Power of assessment: Best judgement: Lack of information
  • VAEC1460 · Power of assessment: Best judgement: General principles for calculating arrears
  • VAEC1470 · Power of assessment: Best judgement: Calculating arrears using observations
  • VAEC1480 · Power of assessment: Best judgement: Calculating arrears using invigilation
  • VAEC1490 · Power of assessment: Best judgement: Calculating arrears using mark-up
  • VAEC1500 · Power of assessment: Best judgement: Other methods used to calculate arrears
  • VAEC1510 · Power of assessment: Best judgement: Determine the overall credibility of your assessment
  • VAEC1520 · Power of assessment: Best judgement: Some remedies for invalid assessments
  • VAEC1530 · Power of assessment: Best judgement: Prime assessments
  • VAEC1540 · Power of assessment: Best judgement: Helpful pointers
  • VAEC1550 · Power of assessment: Best judgement: Consistency with direct taxes assessments
  1. Powers of assessment: Best judgement: Contents page
  2. Power of assessment: Best judgement: Other methods used to calculate arrears

VAEC1500 | Power of assessment: Best judgement: Other methods used to calculate arrears

From HM Revenue & Customs · VAT Assessments and Error Correction

The following are examples of how officers have used other methods to calculate arrears.

Example 1

A till analysis was undertaken on both z readings and the grand total memory. The consecutive numbering of the z readings indicated that some were missing.

The officer used the difference between the grand till memory as shown between one z reading and the next to calculate the assessment.

The appellant challenged the use of till information alone to calculate an assessment and contended that some other method should have been used. The tribunal rejected the argument and upheld the assessment, case Majid & Partners LON/92/570 and LON/91/392.

Example 2

An assessment was raised on the basis of an Inland Revenue assessment. The officer was supplied with details of an IR investigation, together with the amounts and the terms of an offer made by the appellant to the IR.

The officer interviewed the trader in an attempt to agree the reasons for the settlement made with the IR. The trader failed to provide an explanation regarding the source of the money and an assessment and a civil evasion penalty were raised based on the Inland Revenue figures.

The tribunal upheld the assessment and the penalty, case Malcolm Groundwell t/a Angling and Hiking Centre - MAN/95/2554.

PreviousNext
PrivacyTerms