Skip to content
Solved
SearchBrowse
Sign in

Contents

Official guidance
VAT Assessments and Error Correction

VAEC1400 · Powers of assessment: Best judgement: Contents page

  • VAEC1410 · Powers of assessment: Best judgement: The law
  • VAEC1420 · Powers of assessment: Best judgement: Definition
  • VAEC1430 · Power of assessment: Best judgement: How it is determined by tribunal
  • VAEC1431 · Power of assessment: Best judgement: Convincing a tribunal
  • VAEC1440 · Power of assessment: Best judgement: Partial breach of requirements
  • VAEC1450 · Power of assessment: Best judgement: Lack of information
  • VAEC1460 · Power of assessment: Best judgement: General principles for calculating arrears
  • VAEC1470 · Power of assessment: Best judgement: Calculating arrears using observations
  • VAEC1480 · Power of assessment: Best judgement: Calculating arrears using invigilation
  • VAEC1490 · Power of assessment: Best judgement: Calculating arrears using mark-up
  • VAEC1500 · Power of assessment: Best judgement: Other methods used to calculate arrears
  • VAEC1510 · Power of assessment: Best judgement: Determine the overall credibility of your assessment
  • VAEC1520 · Power of assessment: Best judgement: Some remedies for invalid assessments
  • VAEC1530 · Power of assessment: Best judgement: Prime assessments
  • VAEC1540 · Power of assessment: Best judgement: Helpful pointers
  • VAEC1550 · Power of assessment: Best judgement: Consistency with direct taxes assessments
  1. Powers of assessment: Best judgement: Contents page
  2. Power of assessment: Best judgement: Consistency with direct taxes assessments

VAEC1550 | Power of assessment: Best judgement: Consistency with direct taxes assessments

From HM Revenue & Customs · VAT Assessments and Error Correction

In the past where assessments were raised by Customs and Excise officers for indirect taxes, little or no consideration was required to ensure that any corresponding assessments raised for direct taxes reflected the full information gained from, or provided by, the trader.

This meant that in some cases, usually involving civil or criminal evasion, the basis for an indirect taxes assessment could vary significantly to the basis for a direct taxes assessment.

As both departments were separate such anomalies could be explained by reference to the different laws applicable to direct and indirect tax.

Since both departments have merged to form HMRC anomalies of this nature are no longer acceptable and raising assessments based on, for example, different rates of suppression should be avoided.

Assessing officers must therefore ensure, if necessary through formal liaison with their direct taxes colleagues, that their assessments reflect the full information obtained from the trader, regardless of the source of the information, and the basis of their assessment is consistent with the basis of any corresponding direct tax assessment.

Where however, a trader provided a direct taxes officer with different or additional material information that does not affect the original basis of the VAT assessment, we should resist any attempt by the trader to contest the assessment on best judgement grounds.

Guidance on cross tax referrals can be found on the Compliance & Enforcement Programme Homepage.

Previous
PrivacyTerms