Skip to content
Solved
SearchBrowse
Sign in

Contents

Official guidance
VAT Assessments and Error Correction

VAEC1400 · Powers of assessment: Best judgement: Contents page

  • VAEC1410 · Powers of assessment: Best judgement: The law
  • VAEC1420 · Powers of assessment: Best judgement: Definition
  • VAEC1430 · Power of assessment: Best judgement: How it is determined by tribunal
  • VAEC1431 · Power of assessment: Best judgement: Convincing a tribunal
  • VAEC1440 · Power of assessment: Best judgement: Partial breach of requirements
  • VAEC1450 · Power of assessment: Best judgement: Lack of information
  • VAEC1460 · Power of assessment: Best judgement: General principles for calculating arrears
  • VAEC1470 · Power of assessment: Best judgement: Calculating arrears using observations
  • VAEC1480 · Power of assessment: Best judgement: Calculating arrears using invigilation
  • VAEC1490 · Power of assessment: Best judgement: Calculating arrears using mark-up
  • VAEC1500 · Power of assessment: Best judgement: Other methods used to calculate arrears
  • VAEC1510 · Power of assessment: Best judgement: Determine the overall credibility of your assessment
  • VAEC1520 · Power of assessment: Best judgement: Some remedies for invalid assessments
  • VAEC1530 · Power of assessment: Best judgement: Prime assessments
  • VAEC1540 · Power of assessment: Best judgement: Helpful pointers
  • VAEC1550 · Power of assessment: Best judgement: Consistency with direct taxes assessments
  1. Powers of assessment: Best judgement: Contents page
  2. Power of assessment: Best judgement: Calculating arrears using mark-up

VAEC1490 | Power of assessment: Best judgement: Calculating arrears using mark-up

From HM Revenue & Customs · VAT Assessments and Error Correction

The following are examples of how officers have used mark up to calculate arrears.

Example 1

In the absence of records and precise information from the business, the officer carried out a mark-up exercise based on his knowledge and expertise about the trade generally.

The tribunal upheld the assessment, case Playden Oasts Hotel - LON/90/1648.

Example 2

The main basis for the assessment was a mark-up exercise from information of purchases obtained from suppliers. As the business had very few records sales prices were agreed with the appellant.

The assessment was upheld, case K. Sedat t/a Sherrys Kebab and Burger Bar - Lon/90/1780.

Example 3

An assessment was raised on a food to drinks ration and a weighted mark-up calculated on the basis of a 6 week period said to be representative by the appellant.

As there were no menus for the period and a shortage of records, assumptions were made. The appellant was advised of the conclusions drawn from the exercise and invited to comment, which he failed to do.

The tribunal upheld the assessment, case MH Rahman t/a Khayam Restaurant - MAN/96/133.

Example 4

A weighted mark-up for the period chosen was applied linearly to previous periods back to the mark-up accepted by previous officers.

At that time, the mark-up was lower than that of the representative period. The tribunal accepted that the assessment was issued to best judgement and that the linear mark-up is an acceptable basis for an assessment

Based on this decision it should be possible, provided there is an agreement between the business and the officer relating to a period’s mark-up, to undertake a single period weighted mark-up and apply a linear relationship, case Terence Neil Wilshaw - MAN/96/277.

PreviousNext
PrivacyTerms