Skip to content
Solved
SearchBrowse
Sign in

Contents

Official guidance
VAT Assessments and Error Correction

VAEC1400 · Powers of assessment: Best judgement: Contents page

  • VAEC1410 · Powers of assessment: Best judgement: The law
  • VAEC1420 · Powers of assessment: Best judgement: Definition
  • VAEC1430 · Power of assessment: Best judgement: How it is determined by tribunal
  • VAEC1431 · Power of assessment: Best judgement: Convincing a tribunal
  • VAEC1440 · Power of assessment: Best judgement: Partial breach of requirements
  • VAEC1450 · Power of assessment: Best judgement: Lack of information
  • VAEC1460 · Power of assessment: Best judgement: General principles for calculating arrears
  • VAEC1470 · Power of assessment: Best judgement: Calculating arrears using observations
  • VAEC1480 · Power of assessment: Best judgement: Calculating arrears using invigilation
  • VAEC1490 · Power of assessment: Best judgement: Calculating arrears using mark-up
  • VAEC1500 · Power of assessment: Best judgement: Other methods used to calculate arrears
  • VAEC1510 · Power of assessment: Best judgement: Determine the overall credibility of your assessment
  • VAEC1520 · Power of assessment: Best judgement: Some remedies for invalid assessments
  • VAEC1530 · Power of assessment: Best judgement: Prime assessments
  • VAEC1540 · Power of assessment: Best judgement: Helpful pointers
  • VAEC1550 · Power of assessment: Best judgement: Consistency with direct taxes assessments
  1. Powers of assessment: Best judgement: Contents page
  2. Power of assessment: Best judgement: Calculating arrears using invigilation

VAEC1480 | Power of assessment: Best judgement: Calculating arrears using invigilation

From HM Revenue & Customs · VAT Assessments and Error Correction

The following are examples of how officers have used invigilation to calculate arrears.

Example 1

One day of covert external observations and test purchase was undertaken, together with an invigilation exercise for one period of trading when meal slips, invigilation sheets and cash were reconciled.

The business had been closed for two hours during the invigilation. The tribunal was satisfied that the invigilation day was representative

Extrapolation of the invigilation takings to include an assumed amount for the period of closure revealed a lower suppression rate on the average for the day.

The lower rate was applied for the purpose of the assessment. The tribunal found that the officer’s approach had been methodical and upheld the assessment. Case Phoung Dhoung Jimmy Lee t/a Jumbo Express - MAN/95/1126.

Top of page

Example 2

The officer undertook two days of invigilation, both of which indicated trading significantly higher than that declared. The business was unable to provide an explanation for the discrepancy.

Suppression of purchases was also identified and potato supplier’s records obtained. The assessment was based entirely on the invigilation exercise.

The assessment was upheld by the tribunal on the grounds that the officer had little alternative other than to assess in the manner in which he did. Case Kamaljit Kaur and Narinder Singh t/a Andy’s Fish Bar - MAN/96/772.

PreviousNext
PrivacyTerms