Skip to content
Solved
SearchBrowse
Sign in

Contents

Official guidance
Alternative Dispute Resolution Guidance
  • ADRG01000 · Introduction
  • ADRG01100 · How does the process work in practice
  • ADRG01200 · The use of external mediators
  • ADRG01300 · Ground rules for Alternative Dispute Resolution
  • ADRG01400 · Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) is “a flexible process”
  • ADRG01500 · The mediator is impartial and neutral
  • ADRG01600 · The parties in the dispute have ultimate control
  • ADRG01700 · Opportunities for private discussions between the customer, their representatives and the HMRC mediator
  • ADRG01800 · Discussions are held “without prejudice”
  • ADRG01900 · Tax facts are not treated as confidential to the mediation
  • ADRG02000 · Record of documents exchanged during ADR
  • ADRG02100 · Note taking during mediation
  • ADRG02200 · What happens during a typical day of mediation
  • ADRG02300 · Exchange of opening statements before the day of mediation
  • ADRG02400 · Structure of a typical day of mediation
  • ADRG02500 · Concluding ADR: formal “Record of the outcome of the ADR meeting”
  • ADRG02600 · Negotiation and the HMRC Litigation and Settlement Strategy
  • ADRG02700 · What types of cases are suitable for Alternative Dispute Resolution
  • ADRG02800 · Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) is not suitable for every dispute
  • ADRG02900 · Types of disputes not suitable for ADR
  • ADRG03000 · Disagreements about whether a case is suitable for ADR
  • ADRG03100 · HMRC Governance during ADR
  • ADRG03200 · Conclusion
  • ADRG03300 · SUGGESTED TEMPLATE OF THE RECORD OF OUTCOME OF ADR MEETING
  1. Alternative Dispute Resolution Guidance
  2. Conclusion

ADRG03200 | Conclusion

From HM Revenue & Customs · Alternative Dispute Resolution Guidance

ADR is a quick and flexible process that gives the customer and HMRC an opportunity to resolve their dispute without the costs and uncertainty involved in a formal tribunal hearing. They can use the services of a trained mediator and they can take advantage of “without prejudice” discussions to see if there is any possibility of a negotiated agreement.

The parties in dispute are always in control of the decision to settle or not to settle and can work on creating their own negotiated agreement rather that leaving the decision to a tribunal judge.

PreviousNext
PrivacyTerms